🔗 Share this article

The nation's bold action to ban social platforms access for those under 16 is sending ripples internationally. Officials, safety advocates, and guardians are watching intently to see if this strategy will become a template for countries abroad.

European Trend

In Europe, a growing chorus of states are exploring comparable restrictions.

• The Danish government has stated a restriction on social media for under-15s, with the leader stating that phones and networks are "robbing our kids' youth". Legislation may be enacted next year.
• The Norwegian government is preparing to introduce a minimum age limit of 15, citing the need to protect young people from the "influence of the recommendation systems".
• Ireland is working on a digital ID system to verify the user details of social media participants. Officials have indicated that an Australia-style ban is "a potential measures in reserve".
• In Spain, the president has asked lawmakers to pass a proposal lifting the minimum age for accessing social media to 16.
• In France, the president has proposed a ban for children below 15, and a legislative committee has endorsed a related action, potentially involving an overnight "screen time restriction" for older teenagers.
• The administration in the Netherlands has urged families to restrict their youngsters from social media up to the age of 15.

Across the European Union, the EU parliament has adopted a advisory statement supporting a ban for minors unless parental consent is provided. Even though it cautions of the "addictive" nature of these apps, the move does not create mandatory rules.

"A clear age limit is a useful foundation," commented one parliamentarian behind the resolution.

The UK: An Evidence-Based Stance

Across Britain, the administration has not ruled out a possible ban, arguing that "nothing is discarded" but stressing any decision must be "supported by strong research".

Previously, interest grew behind a proposal to enact restrictions on social media use by under-16s, but it was ultimately weakened. Nonetheless, the government pledged to further research the topic.

Advocacy groups have expressed concerns. An organization set up by the loved ones of a girl who was lost after encountering dangerous platform posts contends that a blanket age ban might not protect children and could create a "cliff edge" of risk when users reach the legal age.

"The Australian ban is a reaction to the inability of the Silicon Valley to design tools that are appropriate and fit for children," stated a leading peer.

The United States: A Decentralized Landscape

Across America, action is mostly occurring at the local level due to federal gridlock.

• Utah requires guardian permission for those under 18 to use social media and controls overnight use.
• Florida has signed a bill banning children under fourteen from accessing social media, though it is subject to court battles.
• The state of Virginia has approved a law limiting teenagers to 60 minutes of social media use per day, with any further use dependent on adult consent.
• Georgia, The state of Tennessee, and Louisiana have likewise enacted bills requiring guardian approval for under-16s to set up social media accounts.

Even with cross-party agreement and proposals from some politicians to copy the Australian lead, a nationwide ban is currently seen as unlikely.

International Views

Outside of Europe and the US, additional countries are similarly exploring options.

• The Malaysian government aims to ban social media for teenagers starting from next year.
• The Brazilian authorities has increased the required age for Instagram to 16.

Yet, international organizations strike a more nuanced tone. A major UN agency has cautioned that social media bans carry risks and "could backfire". The body notes that the internet can be a "vital connection" for vulnerable children and that regulation should not be a "replacement" for social media firms to invest in child safeguards.

As this global discussion continues, the policies of this nation and several other countries demonstrate that governments internationally are less and less content to delay for tech companies to self-regulate.